ERROR...PAGE NO LONGER ACTIVE PLEASE RETURN HERE

Board index ‹ Slightly and or totally off topic... ‹ Women In Pantyhose ‹ General Pantyhose Picture Shares Change font size E-mail friend Print view User Control Panel (0 new messages) • View your posts FAQ Members Toplist Gratitudes TPOWIS.NET Chat [0] Logout [ puddlesmuck ] Amatuer Pantyhose Photos of Women Post a reply First unread post • 156 posts • Page 1 of 8 • 12345 ... 8 Amatuer Pantyhose Photos of Women Unread postby superheroinelinks » Wed May 21, 2008 12:21 pm ImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImageImage For the SEXIEST superheroines in Lycra Spandex Tights Pantyhose Leotards Unitards Catsuits & BodyStockings go to: http://www.SuperHeroineLinks.com User avatar superheroinelinks The Organizer Posts: 5302 Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:22 am Location: SuperHeroineLinks.com Has thanked: 53 times Have thanks: 1768 times Top Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Killatron » Tue Oct 13, 2009 7:40 pm Recently, as I go through the image boards here I see more and MORE pantyhose scattered throughout the threads. Be it leggings, cheerleaders, or celebrities, its everywhere. I'm not talking about some hose under a leotard, stuff like that is PERFECTLY acceptable content here, what has my attention here is just pantyhose under a matte skirt. While these photos are still of hot girls in some form fitting attire, it is still NOT spandex and this is a spandex forum. The way I see it, we have two options. Vote above, its gonna be a change either way. Image User avatar Killatron Administration Posts: 375 Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:01 am Location: USA Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 190 times Gender: Male PlayStation Network ID: Kenetic_Vengence Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby davislove » Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:22 pm Killatron there is a pantyhose section already that could be augmented into a couple of sub-sections or reintroduced as a dedicated section with sub parts ect... I have been guilty of mixing in some hosed ones in the leggings section however it looks like you overlooked my statement i made in response to your posting there (page23) and i will quote directly from there: "There are pantyhose and stirrups that resemble leggings from afar and to the camera. The differences are being erased with the newer designs and fashions." Ive been noticing black leggings that resemble pantyhose in terms of being able to see skin and sheen that a girl MUST wear some sort of shorts or skirt to the front and back. If they wear boots or thick cotton socks you really cant tell which one it is. A few examples of what I am saying (all of these have been posted by me earlier) download/file.php?id=12685&mode=view download/file.php?id=12750&mode=view download/file.php?id=13221&mode=view download/file.php?id=13049&mode=view Here is an example that is hard to tell if she had worn boots: http://www.imagewaste.com/ih/pictures/3 ... sed2-L.jpg download/file.php?id=13275&mode=view download/file.php?id=13061&mode=view girl on the extreme right leggings or hosed??: download/file.php?id=13352&mode=view Image (not quite) as clear cut on some of these HUH?Image Fishnets download/file.php?id=13214&mode=view are they considered pantyhose? Not every photo submitted is going to be as confusing as these above but they represent quite a lot of what i have personally posted. Not too many matte skirts in most of my photos :lol: (unofficially) hired and responsible to research and bring 'fresh' content for the benefit of our forum's loyal and growing members User avatar davislove Spandex Enthusiast Posts: 2321 Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 1569 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby superheroinelinks » Wed Oct 14, 2009 12:52 am This is tricky because some girls wear spandex shorts over their pantyhose, then you have pantyhose under spandex catsuits. and pantyhose flavors peppered in as well. Many of the opaque tights look like leggings, then you have footless or to the ankle leggings which may or may not be considered footless pantyhose? I'm on the fence with this one. If it is truly pantyhose, then most of the leg (up to the thigh) should be showing while wearing hotpants, and or a leotard. For certain, something skin tight and form fitting to the body showing off the curves. Most of the pantyhose related photos are here in this one thread. http://www.tpowis.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=193 This seems to be working fine right? Myself personally I prefer opaque tights, and or heavy weight pantyhose. I'm not a big fan of SHEER pantyhose. I like very shiny shimmery pantyhose or Hooters brand peavey pantyhose. I LOVE pics like THIS BUT women in business suits with pantyhose on showing just below the knee or just feet in hose, I AM NOT into at all. It has to be a leotard or swimsuit with pantyhose, or hootergirls or some extremely sexy pantyhose pic. If I post a pantyhose related pic, I try to make sure it is very sexy. Usually a hot babe as a pussycat or some other sexy animal. If not Halloween than as a cock tail waitress showing lots of leg usually past the upper thigh. For the SEXIEST superheroines in Lycra Spandex Tights Pantyhose Leotards Unitards Catsuits & BodyStockings go to: http://www.SuperHeroineLinks.com User avatar superheroinelinks The Organizer Posts: 5302 Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 1:22 am Location: SuperHeroineLinks.com Has thanked: 53 times Have thanks: 1768 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby GF_FITCH » Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:50 am alot of people in these forums mistaken pantyhose or tights as leggings. thats annoying GF_FITCH Lurker Posts: 8 Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:14 am Location: Corona Del Mar, California Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 0 time Gender: Male Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Kraken » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:08 am Difficuld question indeed :?: AFAIK in UK English "tights" are synonymous of "pantyhose" :lol: Really what we could consider "tights" in many cases (workout, wrestling, dancing...) are simply thick pantyhose. And too some of these clothes has no feet, so could be too called "leggings". Being purists, the majority of pantyhose has spandex (lycra) in their content, so could be classified as "spandex". But, though I'm too a pantyhose fetishist, I think that pantyhose in formal or plain attire should not be considered "spandex" if we consider that, in this Forum, means clothes that, fitting tightly, would not conceal the shape of the women who wear them. So I think that the key lay in the hips of the ladies that wore them: if they wore pantyhose under leotards or tight short pants (or directly without skirt, hehe) could be considered "spandex" under the terms of this Forum. But if they wore some other clothes that would conceal the lower belly, beginning of legs and, of course, ass :P , should be considered in other category. My two cents. Kraken Lycra Fan Posts: 29 Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:56 am Has thanked: 1 time Have thanks: 9 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby davislove » Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:01 am editorial I think ive been successful at reading killatron's mind or at least he and i are on the same wave length on a number of issues...lets see if i am reading him right on this one :lol: when he started tpowis what he had in mind was spandex/lycra tights. The pics that i showed thats not what he calls spandex leggings. Looks like he prefers that shiny non see-thru true thicker spandex tights...none of that see-thru thin pantyhose-looking 'stuff'...thats my read... lets c if killatron agrees with me (unofficially) hired and responsible to research and bring 'fresh' content for the benefit of our forum's loyal and growing members User avatar davislove Spandex Enthusiast Posts: 2321 Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 1569 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Killatron » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:06 pm At least I'm not the only one noticing an issue brewing here. Lots of different views here on the issue as well. While I agree with SHL that at a glance, it can be difficult to tell if its leggings or hose. Generally it boils down to the degree of sheer on the legs, the transparency. If its totally opaque, then its leggings, if not, its hose. I think we need to just raise the standard beyond just legs and thighs. Regardless if its hose or leggings, she's gotta be sporting higher than her crotch, preferably to the waist. But doing that will essentially eliminate the common hose found under a skirt or shorts. The down side is, it would eliminate a number of otherwise decent leggings photos. But is that such a bad thing? Overall I think it promotes quality over quantity. Kraken, while tights and pantyhose maybe the same thing. One thing not to discredit is dance tights. These heavy duty pantyhose have a fabric weight on par with leggings, and often come in ultra shimmery variety. However, I also see your point, by the numbers, most pantyhose are spandex. But lycra is in just about everything, so we can't go by that either. In my purist opinion, spandex can ONLY contain Lycra and various forms of nylon. Having a clear coat, heat treatment, or foil addition is perfectly acceptable as well. Cotton mixes I have always thrown into one pile, keeping it separated from the classification filters of the main galleries. I doubt that stance on the matter would come as a surprise to any long time viewer of the site ;) If I were to stick to my views alone, this place would be pretty barren. Right now the pantyhose thread is a mix of just about everything, and as stated, pantyhose are mixed into numerous threads. Closer examination should be done to see if photos contain leggings, or just opaque pantyhose. Hooter's girls are an excellent example of what pantyhose should be. Always in shimmery tights under silky shorts. We can use this to deduce this mess to one simple rule, if the legs ain't shiny, don't post it. Image User avatar Killatron Administration Posts: 375 Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 5:01 am Location: USA Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 190 times Gender: Male PlayStation Network ID: Kenetic_Vengence Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby ShinyGwen » Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:28 pm I agree that pantyhose are sheer, while leggings are thick and opaque. It doesn't matter the cut or the length. Either can be matte or shiny. If the pantyhose accompany a leotard or any purely spandex item, it's categorized by the spandex item. When you start posting pictures of women in business suits with pantyhose on, you're only catering to those who have an EXTREME pantyhose fetish where it doesn't matter what else they're wearing as long as somewhere under there she's wearing pantyhose. That's not what this website is for, and those hardcore pantyhose fetishists probably aren't hanging around on this forum too much anyway. I love wearing shiny pantyhose, but I always wear them with another shiny spandex item! Image User avatar ShinyGwen Powered by Spandex Posts: 255 Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 6:07 pm Location: USA Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 144 times Gender: Female Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby themagic_oftights » Wed Oct 14, 2009 6:17 pm I agree with Killatron and I've voiced this before. The fact that pantyhose may contain spandex or lycra is just an argument of symantics. There are many people that are into pantyhose and they would be better served if they had their own place to gather etc...probably outside of TPOWIS network. If I wanted to look at pantyhose shots I would seek out a pantyhose site. However I'm not interested in that and I am interested in "typical" spandex concepts (tights, leggins, leotards...)...so I come here. User avatar themagic_oftights Lycra Fanatic Posts: 131 Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:11 am Location: Canada Has thanked: 98 times Have thanks: 49 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby davislove » Wed Oct 14, 2009 9:53 pm editorial #2 I just hope we dont get so picky and single minded as to start questioning every photo submitted and knit picking as to whether its thick pantyhose or nonshiny spandex. If we go that route most of us just are going to turn off and tune out and go elsewhere since posting here is such a hassle. We might need to adopt a 'rule of thumb' type standard however be flexible and tolerable as to some of those photos like the ones in my earlier editorial or my post today in the legging section where i specificallly pointed to 3 pics in this same blue color ink...those 3 pics are leggings however they are made of that thin sheer translucent panty hose material 'stuff'. The other 2 pics that i also specified are definitely what killatron had in mind when he 'inagurated' this forum. here is an uploaded photo (1082-L that will be reshown at a later time by the number ive assigned to it) thats not particularly very shiny and its opaque thick spandex jogging/excersise tights no doubt about it. 2nd pic,1081-L girl walking dog is an example of thin semi visible legging that i am sure killatron would think it belongs in pantyhose, yet i think its leggings non lycra. 3rd- 4th pic (1077)also is in that same category as the 2nd pic. It could belong in leggings or pantyhose. Ive seen them manufactured in either leggings or footed pantyhose. We just dont know if these are ankle length or footed or stirrups for that matter. the last pic(1060) again is in that same non lycra 'thin' type legging that killatron defines as 'p-hose' these are more opaque but you may be able to make out her panties. I again just hope we dont get bogged down in technicalities!!...lets not lose the focus of what we are all here for :arrow: visual enjoyment. If it becomes a 'pain in the butt' to post its not going to be worthwhile being here as a member or as a guest. >5 pics that you guys got early set of eyes on< Attachments 1082-L.jpg 1081-L.jpg 1077-L.jpg 1077a-L.jpg 1060-L.jpg (unofficially) hired and responsible to research and bring 'fresh' content for the benefit of our forum's loyal and growing members User avatar davislove Spandex Enthusiast Posts: 2321 Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 1569 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby GF_FITCH » Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:29 pm Kraken wrote:Difficuld question indeed :?: AFAIK in UK English "tights" are synonymous of "pantyhose" :lol: Really what we could consider "tights" in many cases (workout, wrestling, dancing...) are simply thick pantyhose. And too some of these clothes has no feet, so could be too called "leggings". Being purists, the majority of pantyhose has spandex (lycra) in their content, so could be classified as "spandex". But, though I'm too a pantyhose fetishist, I think that pantyhose in formal or plain attire should not be considered "spandex" if we consider that, in this Forum, means clothes that, fitting tightly, would not conceal the shape of the women who wear them. So I think that the key lay in the hips of the ladies that wore them: if they wore pantyhose under leotards or tight short pants (or directly without skirt, hehe) could be considered "spandex" under the terms of this Forum. But if they wore some other clothes that would conceal the lower belly, beginning of legs and, of course, ass :P , should be considered in other category. My two cents. Where are you from by the way and what city do you live in? Just so I can understand what kind of person you are. GF_FITCH Lurker Posts: 8 Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:14 am Location: Corona Del Mar, California Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 0 time Gender: Male Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Kraken » Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:14 am GF_FITCH wrote:Where are you from by the way and what city do you live in? Just so I can understand what kind of person you are. I don't understand your question, man, I think that my origin or place has not link with the topic in discussion... :shock: By the way, I'm not British nor English speaker :| Well, if you're interested I could send you a PM at yor requirement... Kraken Lycra Fan Posts: 29 Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:56 am Has thanked: 1 time Have thanks: 9 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby nash » Fri Oct 16, 2009 7:03 pm Pantyhose and spandex are related. There is some commonality of appeal to both. People who post spandex "finds" are also in a position to post pantyhose "finds". "Finds" = stuff that is exceptionally good. As a matter of convenience I would maintain a pantyhose subtopic somewhere. nash Lycra Fan Posts: 10 Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 3:54 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 5 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Lycrafan2004 » Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:10 am First i have to say that i am also guilty in posting "false" Pantyhose Pics. I am a fan of everything that is tight around the legs and feet and i have many pics you can not guess what the Woman is wearing. The only reason i have posted not so much of these pics is that there was no clearly defined Pantyhose thread here. Some of these pics i posted to the Leotards and Pantyhose- Thread. I second Nash and Davis. You really can not separate between Pantyhose and Leggings if she's wearing boots or long dress. I agree that Pantyhose mostly are thinner and sheer and are worn with dresses and that Leggings are thicker and mostly worn when being sporty. But that Picture of the jogging woman (davis has posted) shows perfectly the abuse that you can not 100% separate between these "trousers". So i can not see the need to become picky and fussy. Of course, the way it is now is not good also (see above). And of course there need to be a line. If not we will see pictures of grandma's tea party here next time. But on the other hand you will find also Latex and Leather pics here in this Spandex Forum. My Suggestion is to create a new Subforum in the Women in Spandex Section (or the General Picture Share- Section) and to move the Pantyhose threads there. The Members then are pleased to post there Pantyhose pics there and if one or two pics are posted false the mods will move them there. So anybody who does not like Pantyhose pics is not "forced" to view these pics. And after clicking on the "mark all threads read" link these topics are no longer mentioned in the recent activities. Maybe you can also install a "ignore this thread"- mod to the forum software. But this needs to set up a second list and i dont know how much effort this is and how the technical requirements are. BTW., when i came here, i asked you, Killatron, if Cotton tights are allowed and if i remember right, you replied, "when its tight, its allowed" or something like that. I am sorry, that i have not saved the message. Image User avatar Lycrafan2004 Spandex Fiend Posts: 1125 Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:31 pm Location: Germany Has thanked: 8 times Have thanks: 513 times Gender: Male Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby davislove » Tue Oct 20, 2009 4:20 pm editorial#3 and hopefully the last??? Here is the perfect picture and hopefully this one will 'put to rest' the idea of setting a legging/pantyhose ironclad rule: this one takes the cake :arrow: Is this pantyhose...leggings... or even lingerie??? Its opaque enough its almost shiny enough to be spandex/lycra and for the hell of it its got a capri-lingerie type hem or finish at the bottom. You can just start to see the different views just on this one pic for example...this could be placed in all 2/3 categories its got a little of everything....maybe not quite pantyhose since it is footless but if it was footed or if she was wearing warm-up socks then it might fit there too...tight lingerie a la girdles... hmmmm... thats a new one that none of you even thought about. A lot of leggings are starting to resemble 'girdles' by the way the bottom hem is formed like in the picture. :idea: Ive seen athletic jogging spandex tights in person and in pics such as the one in editorial#2 have less shine than this pic!!!! Attachments lingerie.leggings.shiny look.jpg (unofficially) hired and responsible to research and bring 'fresh' content for the benefit of our forum's loyal and growing members User avatar davislove Spandex Enthusiast Posts: 2321 Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 1569 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby GF_FITCH » Wed Oct 21, 2009 11:49 am Kraken wrote: GF_FITCH wrote:Where are you from by the way and what city do you live in? Just so I can understand what kind of person you are. I don't understand your question, man, I think that my origin or place has not link with the topic in discussion... :shock: By the way, I'm not British nor English speaker :| Well, if you're interested I could send you a PM at yor requirement... The only reason why you called me "man" is that I listed myself publicly as well as my neighborhood in california. I have no problem sharing the general public my stats but apparently you don't. I personally think you're a wus LOL. Don't private message me just post it in this thread if you got the balls. I just don't understand why people are so scare about post your info on the net? Are you afraid that someone will go look for you and find out what you do with your right or left hand on your own time? GF_FITCH Lurker Posts: 8 Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 1:14 am Location: Corona Del Mar, California Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 0 time Gender: Male Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Lycrafan2004 » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:15 pm C'mon guys, youre drifting into off topic! Keep this private, ok? What a pity that this Picture is so blurry Davis! Its a fantastic one! And by the way davislove wrote:.... and for the hell of it its got a capri-lingerie type hem or finish at the bottom. You can call this "finish" lace ;) But hem is also a good description for this. Image User avatar Lycrafan2004 Spandex Fiend Posts: 1125 Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 12:31 pm Location: Germany Has thanked: 8 times Have thanks: 513 times Gender: Male Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby davislove » Wed Oct 21, 2009 3:50 pm yes thanks for the correction lycrafan its a lace finish reminiscent of lingerie :arrow: Thats exactly the terminology...i was in a supermarket a couple of months back and i saw this type of leggings on a 20something thin female...the difference being that the one in the supermarket was much more transparent than the one in the picture (so she was wearing shorts to cover up for the transperancy...they looked like pantyhose but was in this capri length/ nearing her ankle). Looks like that lace bottom is getting popular and adds that lingerie category as a possibility that i spoke about. on a side note regarding the above manhood-challenging remarks: whenever online/playing online games someone challenges my 'manhood' by saying: so you think you are a tuff guy huh?...i always answer: No, but i am a tuff pussy...or i simply say something to the effect...'looks like my pussyhood is being questioned' (that usually get them off my back)Image Image i can only remember 1 or 2 instaces in the 9 yrs i am online...so i dont have too much experience at this sort of thing (unofficially) hired and responsible to research and bring 'fresh' content for the benefit of our forum's loyal and growing members User avatar davislove Spandex Enthusiast Posts: 2321 Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Has thanked: 0 time Have thanks: 1569 times Top Re: Pantyhose is NOT spandex, but its still sexy... Unread postby Kraken » Wed Oct 21, 2009 4:32 pm GF_FITCH wrote: Kraken wrote: GF_FITCH wrote:Where are you from by the way and what city do you live in? Just so I can understand what kind of person you are. I don't understand your question, man, I think that my origin or place has not link with the topic in discussion... :shock: By the way, I'm not British nor English speaker :| Well, if you're interested I could send you a PM at yor requirement... The only reason why you called me "man" is that I listed myself publicly as well as my neighborhood in california. I have no problem sharing the general public my stats but apparently you don't. I personally think you're a wus LOL. Don't private message me just post it in this thread if you got the balls. I just don't understand why people are so scare about post your info on the net? Are you afraid that someone will go look for you and find out what you do with your right or left hand on your own time? Ok, GF-FITCH, perhaps I misundertood your message but I have enough "balls" to respond you that this forum don't post as condition to put my location and I don't want to put many of my private life because this fetishim could blame my own private life, perhaps some oy you could have the "balls" to show it publically but I think that many of my surroundness would see my fetishim as perversion. So if you could urderstand it, OK, if not, good too. Kraken Lycra Fan Posts: 29 Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 3:56 am Has thanked: 1 time Have thanks: 9 times Top Next Display posts from previous: Sort by Post a reply 156 posts • Page 1 of 8 • 12345 ... 8 Return to General Pantyhose Picture Shares Jump to: Who is online Users browsing this forum: john313, puddlesmuck and 0 guests Advertisement Board index Subscribe topic Bookmark topic The team • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group Advertisements by Advertisement Management The Fine Print: The Power of Women In Spandex website is not responsible for the accuracy, compliance, copyright, legality, decency, or any other aspect of the content posted by the users of this forum. Any disputes over content found that is hosted on TPOWIS.NET should be brought to the attention of the management directly. Content hosted outside of TPOWIS.NET (rapidshare, youtube, imagebam, etc.) should be brought to the attention of the service hosting the content. �2011 TPOWIS.NET